Skip to main content

Publications or Products Referencing ASMD

Please contact AcademicMisconductDatabase@gmail.com if you have publications/products  you would like included on this list:

  1. Siev, J. J., & Teeny, J. D. (2024). Personal Misconduct Elicits Harsher Professional Consequences for Artists (vs. Scientists): A Moral-Decoupling Process. Psychological Science, 35(1), 82-92.
  2. Cameron, A., Latex Package facilitating the search of publicly available databases of academics accused of misconduct, with a focus on sexual misconduct,  https://github.com/alistaircameron/creeps 
  3. Siev, J. J., & Teeny, J. D. (2023). Personal Misconduct Elicits Harsher Professional Consequences for Artists (vs. Scientists): A Moral-Decoupling Process. Psychological Science, 09567976231214739.
  4. Coy, M., Bull, A., Libarkin, J., & Page, T. (2022). Who is the Practitioner in Faculty-Staff Sexual Misconduct Work?: Views from the UK and US. Journal of interpersonal violence37(17-18), NP14996-NP15019.
  5. Widmann, R., Rose, M. E., & Chugunova, M. (2022). Allegations of Sexual Misconduct, Accused Scientists, and Their Research. Max Planck Institute for Innovation & Competition Research Paper, (22-18).
  6. Eckert, S., Metzger-Riftkin, J., Albrehi, F., Akhther, N., Aniapam, Z., & Steiner, L. (2022). # MeToo Academia: News Coverage of Sexual Misconduct at US Universities. Journalism Practice, 1-20.
  7. Young, S. L., & Wiley, K. K. (2021). Erased: Why faculty sexual misconduct is prevalent and how we could prevent it. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 1-25.
  8. Young, S., & Wiley, K. (2021). Erased: ending faculty sexual misconduct in academia: an open letter from women of public affairs education. Public Management Review, 23(6), 797-801.
  9. Grant-Kels, J. M. (2021). Commentary on: Sexual misconduct in academic medicine. International Journal of Women's Dermatology, 7(3), 369.
  10. D’Agostino, M. J., & Elias, N. (2020). Viewpoint Symposium Introduction:# MeToo in Academia: Understanding and Addressing Pervasive Challanges.
  11. Freischlag, J. A., & Files, K. (2020). Sexual Misconduct in Academic Medicine. JAMA, 323(15), 1453-1454.
  12. Rollens, S. E. (2020). Where Are All the Women in Q Studies?: Gender Demographics and the Study of Q1. The Q hypothesis unveiled, 223-253.
  13. Eckert. S., Metzger, J., Steiner, L., Libarkin, J., Ouch, S., Moradi, B., Burdo, X., Buhl, L., Coy, M., 2020, #metoo mentions in U.S. news media coverage of academic sexual misconduct, International Communication Association Conference.
  14. Espinoza M, Hsiehchen D. Characteristics of Faculty Accused of Academic Sexual Misconduct in the Biomedical and Health Sciences. JAMA. 2020;323(15):1503–1505. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2764695
  15. Flachs, A., Olson, E. A., Marston, J. M., & Gillreath-Brown, A. (2019). Mentoring is an intellectual pillar of ethnobiology. Ethnobiology Letters, 10(1), 104-108.
  16. Eckert, S., Michienzi, J., Libarkin, J., Witkowski, M., Moradi, B., Coy, M., Steiner, L., 2019, Who broke it first? How news of sexual misconduct in US academia reaches the public: Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication (AEJMC) 2019.
  17. Cantalupo, Nancy Chi and Kidder, William, Systematic Prevention of a Serial Problem: Sexual Harassment and Bridging Core Concepts of Bakke in the #MeToo Era, 52 UC Davis Law Review 2349-2405 (2019),  https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3348961 
  18. Cantalupo, N. C., Kidder, W. C. (2018). A Systematic Look at a Serial Problem: Sexual Harassment of Students by University Faculty. Utah Law Review, 2018(3), 4.
  19. Included in the NASEM Report on Sexual Harassment of Women: http://sites.nationalacademies.org/shstudy/index.htm